Headline

Automated Confrontation Visual Field Tester

Press Contact: Tom Cockley

New Product News from Gulden Ophthalmics

Gulden’s New Automated Confrontation Visual Field Tester (ACV) Provides Rapid, Inexpensive Confrontation Testing– More Sensitive & Accurate Than Finger Confrontation

ELKINS PARK, PA – The Automated Confrontation Visual Field Tester (ACV) from Gulden Ophthalmics is an automated LED gross confrontational visual field tester. It is cost effective, easy to use, fast (both eyes can be tested in less than a minute). The ACV is more accurate and sensitive than using finger confrontation methods.

The AVC was developed by Jeffrey Cooper, MS, OD, FAAO, Clinical Professor, SUNY State College of Optometry; evaluated and standardized by Sherry J. Bass, MS, OD, FAAO, Distinguished Teaching Professor, SUNY State College of Optometry." The ACV instrument is a compact, black, rectangular instrument with a 1.0-mm red light-emitting diode (LED) at each of its four corners and a fixation hole at the center. The device presents automated, randomized patterns of lit LEDs and the patient is asked to identify the number of lights seen. The eye care professional views the tested eye though the device to ensure fixation on the center and is able to validate the patient’s response with the four indicators on the rear panel while the patient identifies the presentations of the random LED pattern on the front.

Determination of visual field loss is an important part of a comprehensive eye examination. However, routine threshold or screening visual fields, are time consuming, and have not been shown to be cost effective because of their relatively low detection rate. On the other hand, gross confrontation visual field testing is rapid and inexpensive to perform and is considered an essential part of a comprehensive eye examination. Unfortunately, gross confrontation visual field testing has not been standardized. Clinicians tend to vary targets or testing techniques; targets are typically not uniform and may include fingers (either stationary or oscillating), the palms of the hand, the examiner’s face, or illuminated white or colored stimuli.

Gulden’s ACV is cost effective and simple to use, and requires very little training or experience. Because it is automated and consistent, examiner variability is not as much of an issue as it is with finger counting or finger oscillation confrontation visual field testing.

A controlled study that examined visual field testing methods at SUNY State College of Optometry indicated that the device has a greater sensitivity and is more accurate in the detection of moderate visual field loss than finger counting confrontation visual field tests. The study reported that screening with the ACV uncovered visual field loss by being able to detect smaller scotomas, which were missed in patients tested with finger counting confrontation. The study noted that other studies, which have utilized small red objects such as the LEDs used in the ACV, are more sensitive for the detection of both neurologic and glaucomatous field loss than finger or hand methods.

The ACV tester consists of a black unit measuring 12 cm by 17 cm. Four 1.0-mm red LEDs are positioned 11.25 cm apart, which results in an angular separation of 15° when the device is 60 cm from the patient. The tester is powered by an easily obtainable, 2 standard AA batteries.

Reference: Bass, SJ, Cooper J, Feldman J, Horn D. Comparison of an automated confrontation-testing device vs. finger counting in the detection of field loss. Optometry 2007 78(8): 390-95.

###

For more information, contact Gulden Ophthalmics, 225 Cadwalader Avenue, Elkins Park, PA 19027-2020 Tel 215-884-8105 Fax 215-884-0418

www.guldenophthalmics.com email: info@guldenophthalmics.com